DADAGLOBE which opens to the public on Sunday at the MoMA is an ambitious attempt by Tristan Tzara & Francis Picabia to create an anthology of the Dada Art Movement. For those unfamiliar with either Tzara & Picabia (which included me) Tzara (b. Romania 1896-1963) was a poet, playwright & art critic. Picabia (b. France 1897-1953) was a poet & painter associated with cubism, surrealism & dadism. Dadaism is considered artistic anarchy stemming from rebellion towards social, political & cultural norms or values of the epoch (1915-1924.) The quandary created by Tzara & Picabia in requesting (via mail) samples of art, prose & poetry from 50 artists in 10 different countries, stipulating constraints on their works is hypocritical to a rebellious, avant garde art form. Works conforming to standards of expectations are not rebellious. My 1st connotation of DaDa art is Duchamp's urinal or non-functional bicycle. There were few sculptures in the exhibit. Two were highlights of the show: a wooden head, a fragment from a Brancusi sculpture and "Dada Head" by Sophie Taeuber (b. Swiss 1989-1943); the lone female artist. Most of the works were photographs mostly of similar size. The photos by Man Ray & Marcel DuChamp were intriguing. Some of the photos were of works by Jean Arp & Brancusi. Needless, the homogeneous sized black/white photos had a commonality that mocked originality. Tzara & Picabia requested a limited palette of 3 colors for original drawings/paintings which again defies creative freedom. There are numerous handwritten prose/poetry submitted that didn't garner my interest. Financial difficulties & "artistic" differences between Tzara & Picabia were blamed for the project not coming to fruition. Possibly, the reason their project flopped was they intuited their approach yielded Dada art passe.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't be shy, let me know what you think